Disguised Expropriation

July 6, 2018

 

Lorraine (Ville) v. 2646‐8926 Québec inc.

 

This action in nullity was also prescribed in accordance with the 10 year general law prescriptive period provided for in art. 2922 of the Civil Code of Québec, which, as the Act respecting the implementation of the reform of the Civil Code provides, began to run on January 1, 1994. This means that that period ended on January 1, 2004, well before the action in nullity was filed in November 2007.

 

A plaintiff who no longer meets the conditions for applying for judicial review still has the right, however, in appropriate cases and if the claim is supported by the evidence, to seek payment of an indemnity for disguised expropriation. This case can continue in the Superior Court on the claims that remain unresolved, including the claim for an indemnity for disguised expropriation.

 

Full Case Ruling:  Lorraine (Ville) v. 2646‐8926 Québec inc.

 

 

 

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Please reload

Hastings Cottage Removed

November 19, 2019

Action sought on record-high water levels

November 8, 2019

1/15
Please reload

You Might Also Like:
  • Corke Point
  • White Instagram Icon
Stephen Corke

I am the 3rd generation owner of Corke Point and

Long Point Ratepayers' Association Member

(647) 213-1026    

stephen@corkepoint.com

 

© 2023 Corke Point. Proudly created with Wix.com

This site was designed with the
.com
website builder. Create your website today.
Start Now